Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi

The Journal of Academic History and Thought is a scientific publication that takes humanity as its central focus, aiming to disseminate original and internationally recognized scientific research related to human affairs. Emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity, the journal encourages academic research to be conducted from diverse and comprehensive perspectives. It seeks to contribute to the scholarly literature by publishing significant studies in all areas of the humanities and social sciences.

In an effort to address the methodological challenges in traditional approaches within the social and human sciences and to promote the application of diverse research methodologies, the Journal of Academic History and Thought has adopted a publication schedule of six issues per year, beginning in 2023. Issues are released in February, April, June, August, October, and December. By embracing a broader range of research methodologies, the journal aims to foster studies that make meaningful contributions to the intellectual world of humanity.

The Journal of Academic History and Thought is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed electronic journal that publishes six times a year. It accepts articles in various disciplines, including history, geography, religious studies, educational sciences, philosophy, architecture, linguistics and literature, archaeology, art, political history, human geography, civil defense, economics, transportation, traffic, logistics, Health sciences, engineering, the history of civilizations, etymology, urban studies, law, political science, public administration, urban history, environmental economics, historical psychology, sociology, and philology. Within this framework, the journal welcomes research articles, review studies, meta-analyses, and meta-synthesis studies.

Yazım Kuralları

Academic Journal Guidelines
Publication Guidelines of the Journal of Academic History and Thought
(Effective from the issue published in April 2023)

1. All rights and responsibilities concerning the content of articles published in the Journal of Academic History and Thought rest solely with the authors. However, authors cannot request the removal or deletion of their articles once published in the journal.

2. As copyright for the published articles legally belongs to the Journal of Academic History and Thought, it is strictly prohibited to partially or fully quote, copy, or republish any article without proper citation.

3. The submission of an article to the journal does not guarantee its publication.

4. Submitted articles undergo an initial editorial review before being considered for evaluation. The journal reserves the right to reject or delete articles that do not pass the editorial review.

5. If authors fail to respond to revision requests for more than a year, the journal does not guarantee the retention of articles in draft form within its system.

6. Neither the author nor any third party may request the removal of a published article without legal justification and a court decision. The journal editorial board reserves the right to remove an article if deemed necessary.

7. The evaluation and publication process of articles is conducted with strict adherence to scientific and ethical standards. Authors are not entitled to request information regarding the identity of peer reviewers in the double-blind peer-review process. The Journal of Academic History and Thought holds the sole authority in managing and finalizing the peer-review process.

8. If a close relationship or prior acquaintance between an author and a reviewer is detected at any stage of the evaluation process, the journal reserves all legal rights to suspend the process and, if necessary, reject the article.

9. Articles submitted to the Journal of Academic History and Thought must be uploaded in Word format without any author-identifying information via the journal's online system (https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atdd). Published articles will also be available on this platform. Authors experiencing difficulties in submitting articles may contact the journal’s official email address (akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com) for support.

10. Articles must adhere to the template provided in the journal’s menu. The Journal of Academic History and Thought accepts submissions in the fields of history, geography, religious studies, philosophy, pedagogy, architecture, linguistics and literature, archaeology, art, political history, human geography, civil defence, economics, transportation, traffic, logistics, civilization history, etymology, urban planning, law, political science, public administration, urban history, environmental economics, historical psychology, and sociology.

11. Authors must submit a plagiarism report along with their articles. The similarity index of submitted articles must not exceed 18%. Additionally, the journal independently verifies similarity rates using the iThenticate software.

12. A copyright transfer form must be completed and submitted alongside the article.

13. Articles that pass the preliminary review are subjected to a double-blind peer-review process by two referees assigned by an editor. If deemed necessary, the article may be sent to a third referee. The publication of an article that has passed editorial approval is not guaranteed for the next issue. The publication timeline depends on the reviewers’ assessments, the article’s readiness for publication, and fulfilment of necessary criteria. Once finalized, the article will be assigned to a suitable issue upon the approval of the editorial board.

14. Throughout the evaluation process, the assigned editor is responsible for overseeing the article’s compliance with grammar, coherence, academic writing standards, and referee recommendations.

15. The Journal of Academic History and Thought upholds high standards of research and publication ethics. If an ethical approval certificate is required for the submitted research, the relevant document must be submitted along with the article. Should the editor request this document at a later stage, the author is obliged to provide it. Failure to submit the required ethical approval document will result in the rejection of the article.

16. Unless there is a valid reason approved by the editorial board, an article that has entered the evaluation process cannot be withdrawn. If an author wishes to withdraw their submission, they must submit a formal request via email to the editorial board. However, the final decision regarding withdrawal will be made by the editorial board and will follow an appropriate process.

PUBLICATION PROCESS
Articles submitted to the Journal of Academic History and Thought undergo the following stages

• Preliminary Review
• Plagiarism Screening
• Field Editor Review
• Peer Review
• Language and Writing Editing
• Typesetting and Layout

Once an article passes the preliminary review, it is subjected to plagiarism screening before being assigned to the relevant field editor. Articles deemed unsuitable or misaligned with the journal’s scope are returned to the author. Articles that successfully pass the preliminary review are sent to two reviewers under the double-blind peer review system (preferably, one from Turkey and one from an international institution). If both reviewers provide positive evaluations, the article is returned to the author for any necessary revisions. After these revisions are completed, the article undergoes final language and writing editing before being approved for publication. The article is then formatted and assigned to an issue deemed appropriate by the editorial board.

If one reviewer provides a positive evaluation while the other submits a negative one, the article is forwarded to a third reviewer. The editorial decision is based on the third reviewer’s assessment. Should the third review create uncertainty, a fourth reviewer may be consulted if deemed necessary.

Throughout the review process, strict confidentiality is maintained—authors do not know the identities of the reviewers, and vice versa. The editor has full authority to ensure the anonymity of both parties.

There is no predetermined limit on the number of articles per issue. However, one-quarter of the articles in each issue are allocated to submissions from members of the editorial board and the journal’s advisory committee. Articles submitted by these members are subject to the double-blind peer review process, managed by international guest editors assigned specifically for this purpose.

Copyright and Author Agreement

Click here to access the Copyright and Author Agreement

This writing guide has been prepared to ensure consistency and coherence in articles submitted to the Journal of Academic History and Thought. The guidelines outlined herein aim to maintain a uniform structure across all articles and throughout the entirety of each submission. Authors must adhere to scientific ethical principles and avoid plagiarism under all circumstances. The full responsibility for the content of each article rests solely with the author. Scholars submitting their research to the Journal of Academic History and Thought must comply with the following rules:

Requirements for Submitted Articles

• Articles must be original.
• They must adhere to scientific standards.
• They should evaluate significant developments in a specific field, providing proper references.

All published articles remain open for discussion until the release of the journal's subsequent issue. Articles must be submitted in Word format via the DergiPark system; submissions in PDF format will not be accepted. The uploaded document must not contain any author-identifying information, such as the author's name or ORCID number. Each author may publish a maximum of two articles in a single issue, provided they meet the necessary criteria.
Manuscript Formatting Guidelines

Articles must consist of a title page, main content, and references. Additional elements such as tables and figures may be included if necessary. Authors must adhere to these formatting rules:

• The text must be written in Times New Roman font.
• Line spacing: 1.5
• Page margins: 2.5 cm on all sides
• Paragraph indentation: The first line of each paragraph should be indented by 0.5 inches from the left margin. Use the TAB key or the automatic paragraph formatting function in a word processor to apply indentation.
Articles must follow the APA 7 citation style.

Reference Formatting Guidelines

Journal Articles

Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185

• In-text citation (parenthetical): (Grady et al., 2019)

• In-text citation (narrative): Grady et al. (2019)

Books

Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.

• In-text citation (parenthetical): (Jackson, 2019; Sapolsky, 2017; Svendsen & Løber, 2020)

• In-text citation (narrative): Jackson (2019), Sapolsky (2017), and Svendsen and Løber (2020)

Religious Texts

The Bhagavad Gita (E. Easwaran, Trans.; 2nd ed.). (2007). The Blue Mountain Center of Meditation.

King James Bible. (2017). King James Bible Online. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/ (Original work published 1769)

• In-text citation (parenthetical): (The Bhagavad Gita, 2007; King James Bible, 1769/2017)

• In-text citation (narrative): The Bhagavad Gita (2007) and King James Bible (1769/2017)

Edited Book Chapters

Aron, L., Botella, M., & Lubart, T. (2019). Culinary arts: Talent and development. In R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius, & F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 345–359). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-016

Dillard, J. P. (2020). Trends in persuasion research. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (4th ed., pp. 115–129). Routledge.

Thestrup, K. (2010). Transforming, communicating, playing—The community of experience in action. In E. Hygum & P. M. Pedersen (Eds.), Early childhood education: Values and practices in Denmark. Hans Reitzels Forlag. https://earlychildhoodeducation.digi.hansreitzel.dk/?id=192

• In-text citation (parenthetical): (Aron et al., 2019; Dillard, 2020; Thestrup, 2010)

• In-text citation (narrative): Aron et al. (2019), Dillard (2020), and Thestrup (2010)

Government Reports

National Cancer Institute. (2019). Taking time: Support for people with cancer (NIH Publication No. 18-2059). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/patient-education/takingtime.pdf

• In-text citation (parenthetical): (National Cancer Institute, 2019)

• In-text citation (narrative): National Cancer Institute (2019)

For more detailed information on APA 7 formatting guidelines, including additional examples, please click here.
Additional Information

• After editor approval, submitted articles are subject to a publication fee, which is requested from the author.

• All journal-related expenses—including publication and printing costs, translator fees, DOI registration fees, and other operational expenses—are covered by the publication fees. The journal operates on a non-profit basis.

AKADEMİK TARİH VE DÜŞÜNCE DERGİSİ YAYIN BİLGİSİ VE YAZIM KURALLARI
(2023 YILI NİSAN AYINDAN İTİBAREN YAYINLANACAK SAYIDA BU KURALLAR GEÇERLİDİR.)

1-Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi'nde yayınlanan yazıların ve yazı içeriklerinin tüm hak ve sorumlulukları yazarlarına aittir. Buna karşın yazar, dergide yayınlanan yazının yayından kaldırılmasını ve silinmesini talep edemez.

2-Yayınlanan yazıların telif hakları hukuken Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi'ne ait olduğu için eserlerin kaynak gösterilmeden kısmen yada tamemen alıntılanması, kopyalanması ve yayınlanması yasaktır.

3-Dergiye gönderilen yazıların yayınlanma zorunluluğu bulunmamaktadır.

4- Dergiye gönderilen yazılar editör onayından geçtikten sonra değerlendirmeye alınır. Dergi, editör onayından geçmeyen yazıların iade edilmesi ve silinmesi hakkını saklı tutar.

5-Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, değerlendirmeye alınan yazıların ön görülen revizyonuyla ilgili yazarlara yazılan iletilere bir yıldan fazla yanıt alamadığında dergi sisteminde taslak halinde kalan makalelerin silinmeme garantisini vermez.

6-Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi'nde yayınlanan bir yazı yada makale hukuksal bir gerekçe ve mahkeme kararı olmaksızın yazar yada diğer kişiler tarafından yayından kaldırılmasını talep edemezler. Dergi editörlüğü bir yazının yayından kaldırılması hakkını saklı tutar.

7-Yazarlar için yazılar ve makalelerin değerlendirilme ve yayın süreci bilimsel ve ahlaki etik gereğince mahrem bir durum olup; yazarlar çift kör akran-hakem değerlendirmesinde hakem kimliğine dair bilgi talep edemezler. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, yazar, hakem diyalogunda temel sorumluluk sahibi olarak süreci yürütüp tamamlama yetkisini elinde bulundurur.

8-Yazı yada makalenin değerlendirilme sürecinde süreç aşaması ne olursa olsun yazarla hakem arasında yakın bir ilişki ve haberlarlık tespit edilmesi durumunda dergi tüm yasal haklarını kullanarak ilgili süreci durdurma ve gerekiyorsa yazı yada makaleyi red etme hakkına sahiptir.

9-Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi'ne makaleler word formatında üzeride yazar ad ve bilgileri bulunmadan (https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atdd) dergi sistemi üzerinden yüklenerek süreç yürütülür. Makale yayını yine aynı url adresi üzerinden yayınlanır. Siteme makale yüklemede zorluk yaşayan yazarlar, dergi temel iletişim adresi olan (akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com) adresine makalelerini yollayarak dergi sistemiyle ilgili detek talep edebilirler.

10-Yazı ve makaleler dergi menüsünde yer alan şablona göre ilgili bölümlerden oluşmuş olmalıdır. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, tarih, coğrafya, din bilimleri, felsefe, pedagoji, mimari, dil bilimleri ve edebiyat, arkeoloji, sanat, siyasi tarih, beşeri coğrafya, sivil savunma, ekonomi, ulaşım, trafik, lojistik, medeniyetler tarihi, etimoloji, şehircilik, hukuk, siyaset bilimi, kamu yönetimi, kent tarihi, çevre ekonomisi, tarihsel psikoloji ve sosyoloji gibi sahalarda makale kabul eden elektronik bir dergidir.

11-Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi'ne gönderilen makaleler için yazarlar alacakları intihal raporunu da makale ile birlikte göndereceklerdir. Makalenin yayınlanması için benzerlik oranı yüzde 18’i geçmemelidir.Gönderilen makalelerin benzerlik oranı ayrıca iThenticate programı ile dergimiz tarafından da alınmaktadır.

12-Dergiye makale gönderilirken Telif hakkı formu doldurulmalı ve makale ile birlikte gönderilmelidir.

13-Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi'ne gönderilen makaleler ön kontrolden geçtikten sonra atanan editör vasıtasıyla 2 hakeme (kör hakemlik) sunulur. Bu iki hakemden alınan sonuca göre makale gerek görülürse üçüncü hakeme gönderilir. Editör onayından geçmiş bir makalenin bu tarihi takip eden ilk sayıda yayınlanma durumu net değildir. Makalenin yayın süreci, hakemlerin tespitlerine, makalenin yayın için olgunlaşmasına ve yayın için gerekli olan kriterlere bağlı olarak değişme göstermektedir. Bu anlamda süreci tamamlanan ve yayına hazır hale gelen makale, yayın kuruluna sevk edilerek uygun görülen sayıda yer alacaktır.

14-Değerlendirmeye alınan makalenin yayın süreci tamamlanana kadar sorumluluğu ilgili editöre ait olup yürütülen sürecin tüm basamaklarında editör makaleyi imla, anlatım, yazım kurallarına uygunluk ve ilmi bakımdan hakem önerilerine göre takip etmekle yükümlüdür.

15-Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi'ne gönderilen makalelerde araştırma ve yayın etiği üst düzeyde önemlidir. Gönderilecek araştırmada etik kurul izin belgesi gerekliyse makale ile birlikte ilgili etik kurul izin belgesinin de gönderilmesi gereklidir. Yine ilgili belge editör tarafından yeniden talep edlirse yazar söz konusu belgeyi göndermekle yükümlüdür. Etik kurul belgesi talep edildiği halde belgeyi göndermeyen yazarın makalesi iade edilecektir.

16-Yayın kurulunca kabul edilecek geçerli bir neden olmadıkça süreci başlayan bir makalenin yazarına iadesi mümkün değildir. Bu konuda yazar süreci sonlandırmak isterse dergi editörlüğüne mail yoluyla dilekçe sunarak bu talepte buluna bilir ancak işleyen sürecin sonlandırılma kararı yayın kurulu kararı ile ve uygun görülen süreçte olacaktır.

YAYIN SÜRECİ

Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi’ne gönderilen makaleler

ÖN İNCELEME, İNTİHAL TARAMASI, ALAN EDİTÖRÜ İNCELEMESİ, HAKEM DEĞERLENDİRMESİ, DİL VE YAZIM EDİTÖRÜ İNCELEMESİ, MİZANPAJ

aşamalarından geçmektedir.

Ön incelemesi tamamlanan makale uygun görülürse intihal taraması ardından alan editörüne aktarılır. Uygun görülmeyen ve dergi içeriğine uygun olmayan makaleler yazara iade edilir. Ön incelemede uygun bulunan makaleler kör hakemlik uygulaması ekseninde iki hakeme (tercihen biri Türkiye’den diğeri başka ülkeden) gönderilir. Her iki hakemden de olumlu rapor alan makale ön görülen düzeltmeler varsa yazara bildirilerek eksikleri tamamlanır ve makale dil ve yazım editörü kontrolü ardından yıl içinde yayımlanmak üzere kabul edilerek mizanpaja verilir ve yayım kurulunun uygun göreceği bir sayıya atanarak yayımlanır.

Değerlendirme sürecinde iki hakemden birinden olumlu birinden olumsuz rapor alan makale üçüncü bir hakeme gönderilir. Üçüncü hakemden alınan görüşe göre sürece devam edilir. Üçüncü hakem görüşü editörde tereddüt uyandırırsa gerek görüldüğü takdirde dördüncü hakeme müracaat edilebilir.
Yayım sürecinde yazar için hakem, hakem için ise yazar kimliğinin bilinmemesi büyük önem arz etmektedir. Editör, yazar hakem gizliliğinin korunmasında tam yetkilidir.
atdd’de her sayı için makale sayı sınırı olmayıp bir sayıda yer alacak makalelerin ¼’lik kısmı dergi editöryel ekip ve yayın kurulu üyelerine ayrılmıştır. Dergi editöryel ekip ve yayın kurulundan gelecek makaleler görevlendirilecek yurt dışı editörler tarafından kör hakemlik süreçlerine tabi tutularak gerekli yayın süreci işletilecektir.

1. Telif Hakları ve Yazar Sözleşmesi için Tıklayınız

Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi’nde yayınlanacak makale yazımında yönlendirici olmak ve yapılan çalışmalarda bir bütünlük sağlamak amacıyla bu yazım kılavuzu hazırlanmıştır. Yazım kılavuzunda bulunan kurallarla; makaleler arasında ve makalenin başlangıcından sonuna kadar genel bir bütünlük oluşturmak hedeflenmektedir. Makalelerde bilimsel etik kuralları mutlaka gözetilmeli, özellikle intihalden kaçınılmalıdır. Söz konusu çalışmalarda tüm sorumluluk makalenin yazarına aittir. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi’ne bilimsel çalışmalarını gönderecek bilim insanlarının aşağıda belirtilen kurallara uyması zorunludur.

Dergiye Gönderilecek Makaleler Hakkında;

Özgün olmalıdır.

Bilimsel olmalıdır.

Belirli bir konuda önemli gelişmeleri değerlendirip gerekli kaynak gösterilerek yazılmış olmalıdır. Dergide yayımlanan tüm makaleler yayın tarihinden itibaren derginin bir sonraki sayısına kadar tartışmaya açık olacaktır. Makaleler Word formatında yazılmalı, Dergi Park üzerinden dergiye PDF formatında gönderilecek makaleler kabul edilmeyecektir. Sisteme yüklenen makale üzerinde yazar adı, orcid numarası gibi yazara ait bilgiler yer almamalıdır.Bir sayıda aynı yazarın gerekli koşulları sağlaması şartıyla iki makalesi yayınlanabilir.

Makale Yazım Kuralları

Makaleler başlık sayfası, içerik ve kaynakçadan oluşur. Duruma bağlı olarak tablolar ve şekiller gibi ek unsurlar içerebilirler. Hazırlanmış makalelerde bu bölümlere uyulmalı ve Times New Roman yazı tipi kullanılmalıdır. Makalede 1,5 satır aralığı kullanılmalı ve sayfanın her tarafından 2,5 cm boşluk bırakılmalıdır. Her paragrafının ilk satırı sol kenar boşluğundan 0,5 inç kadar girintili yapılmalıdır. Girintiyi elde etmek için TAB tuşu veya kelime işlemci programının otomatik paragraf biçimlendirme işlevi kullanılmalıdır.

Makalelerde APA 7 sistemi uygulanacaktır.

Makale kaynakları Yazımı

Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks
that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207–
217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185

• Parantez içinde alıntılar: (Grady et al., 2019)
• Anlatı alıntılar: Grady et al. (2019)

Tam yazılmış kitap

Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.

• Parantez içinde alıntılar: (Jackson, 2019; Sapolsky, 2017; Svendsen & Løber, 2020)
• Anlatı alıntılar: Jackson (2019), Sapolsky (2017), and Svendsen and Løber (2020)

Dini Eserler

The Bhagavad Gita (E. Easwaran, Trans.; 2nd ed.). (2007). The Blue Mountain Center of Meditation.
King James Bible. (2017). King James Bible Online. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/ (Original work published
1769)
• Parantez içinde alıntılar: (The Bhagavad Gita, 2007; King James Bible, 1769/2017)
• Anlatı alıntılar: The Bhagavad Gita (2007) and King James Bible (1769/2017)

Editör Kitap Bölümleri

Aron, L., Botella, M. ve Lubart, T. (2019). Mutfak sanatları: Yetenek ve gelişimi. RF Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius ve
FC Worrell (Eds.), Yüksek performansın psikolojisi: İnsan potansiyelini alana özgü yeteneklere
dönüştürmek (s. 345-359). Amerika Psikoloji Derneği. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-016

Dillard, JP (2020). İkna çalışmalarındaki akımlar. MB Oliver, AA Raney ve J. Bryant (Eds.), Medya etkileri: Teori ve
araştırmadaki gelişmeler (4. baskı, s. 115-129). Routledge.

Thestrup, K. (2010). Dönüştürmek, iletişim kurmak, oynamak için - Eylemdeki deney topluluğu. E. Hygum & PM
Pedersen (Ed.), Erken çocukluk eğitimi: Danimarka'daki değerler ve uygulamalar. Hans Reitzels
Forlag. https://earlychildhoodeducation.digi.hansreitzel.dk/?id=192

• Parantez içinde alıntılar: (Aron vd., 2019; Dillard, 2020; Thestrup, 2010)
• Anlatı alıntılar: Aron ve ark. (2019), Dillard (2020) ve Thestrup (2010)

Bir Devlet Kurumu Raporu

National Cancer Institute. (2019). Taking time: Support for people with cancer (NIH Publication No. 18-2059). U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/patient-education/takingtime.pdf

• Parantez içinde alıntılar: (National Cancer Institute, 2019)
• Anlatı alıntılar: National Cancer Institute (2019)

APA 7 Yazım kurallarıyla ilgili daha geniş bilgi ve daha fazla eser ve örnekleri için lütfen tıklayınız.

*Sisteme yüklenen makaleler editör onayından sonra ücrete tabi olur ve ilgili yazardan bu talep edilir.

*Dergiye ait tüm giderler, gerektiğinde yayın ve matbaa ücretleri, tercüman alacakları, Doi masrafları ve diğer giderler ilgili yayın ücretinden karşılanmakta olup kâr amacı güdülmemektedir.

Etik İlkeler ve Yayın Politikası

REGULATION for PUBLICATION ETHICS of ACADEMİC JOURNAL oF HİSTORY and IDEA

Publication ethics

Publication transactions (processes) of Academic Journal of History and Idea are based upon putting knowledge forward neutrally (objectively), developing and sharing it. This situation is first step to original studies; and is basis of publication ethics of journal, as well. Peer-reviewed articles are studies that scientific researches and methods are valid and that take contributing to literature as a goal. In this context, process of scientific publication concerns all of publisher, editors, authors (writers), peer-reviewers and readers. Therefore, these components should also undertake obeying (conform) to the said codes of conduct (ethics rules) as a duty. Based on this sentence, there is a publication ethics and open access policy of Academic Journal of History and Idea and this issue necessitates (requires) that all parties should obey the codes of conduct (ethics rules) during the publication process in line with guidelines and policies, published by Committee on Publication Ethics–COPE– on open access (for example; ‘‘Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors’’ and ‘‘COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors’’. During the publication, to encounter situations, such as confronting to knowledge distorted on articles, using the unfounded knowledge and documents in the study, and violating individual rights etc., shall be reason for refusal of the study directly, and on this issue the author (writer) and his/her affiliated institution shall be informed through official channel(s). While articles which have been sended to the journal are being made ready for publication according to their current situations after their scientific situation has been determined during publication process, they shall be made ripe (matured) from different multi-directional points of view and shall gain scientific quality (feature) by publishing on the following first issue upon final approval (confirmation) which would be taken from peer-reviewers

Publisher’s ethical responsibilities

Academic Journal of History and Idea is a publication organization that looks after public interest (benefit) without being supported by any institution and that does not seek profit (non-profit). Academic Journal of History and Idea has been conducting its ethical rules (codes of ethics)-bound and systematic studies at the helm of General Board of Publication and editor-in-chief since December 2013 when it published its first issue.

Publication, advisory and editorial boards of Academic Journal of History and Idea are conducted on a volunteer basis by important scientists at universities from different countries in the world including Turkey. Editor-in-chief is a person-in charge who follows all publication process sticking to ethical rules (codes of conduct) in behalf of publication board, and editor-in-chief provides for the process to continue without interruption, through editors whom are tasked (assigned) by editor-in-chief, and deputy editors if needs be. Editors, whom are tasked (assigned) according to subjects of articles, function (serve) as a bridge between authors (writers)&peer-reviewers, and editors are persons-in charge who provide for the matured articles to convey to publication board. If deemed necessary, editors-in-chief can send articles to faculty members (teaching fellows) who are not member of Editorial Board by giving task of field editor.

Responsibilities of Editorial Board

Editorial board is responsible for articles which have come to Academic Journal of History and Idea. Responsibility of editorial board is conducted as a priority of public interest (benefit), for the purpose of service to science, and without thinking personal gain. There is an independent relationship between editorial board and publisher. All decisions which will be taken by editors are independent in line with ethical principles. While editorial board is making a decision to the appropriateness (suitability) and the publication of the submitted writings (manuscripts), editorial board does it (makes a decision) according to publication policy and scientific sensitivity of the journal, but not to factors such as author(s), author(s)’s race, gender, belief and nationality etc.

Editorial board keeps (takes) privacy as a basis in process (transaction) steps and can not share personal information (details) with peer-reviewers, members and publisher. Editorial Board makes an effort to develop (improve) the journal consistently and to rise (enhance) the quality of publication. Editorial Board provides for determination and implementation of journal policies, such as publication, blind review, peer reviewing process and ethical principles etc. Editorial Board protects authors’ copyright of articles, published in Academic Journal of History and Idea. Editorial board prepares for ‘‘Guide for Author (Author Guidelines)’’ consisting of author(s)’ knowledge/information requirements; and for ‘‘Guide for Peer Reviewer (Peer Reviewer Guidelines)’’ containing knowledge/information which peer reviewers would need during peer reviewing process, and when required, Editorial board updates them.Editorial Board keeps (stores) in written or electronically records of each article and correspondences concerning the journal. Editorial Board follows index and database functionings (operations) of the journal.

Editors’s Ethical Responsibilities

Editors are responsible for satisfying peer-reviewers’, authors’ and readers’ knowledge/information requirements; giving feedback when needed; correcting (emending) during publication process; and acting upon principle of clarity (publicity) on subjects which require explanation. Editors are attentive to articles to be original while they are making a decision of publication of articles, to scientific literature, and to articles to make contribution to readers, researchers and implementer. Editors shall refuse (reject) directly the article having 15% of similarity during plagiarism screening/checking and shall inform it to the author. While Editors are making a positive or negative decision for articles, they take into account original (authentic) value of articles and their contribution to the field, validity and reliability of research method, clarity (openness) of the narration (expression), and purpose and scope of the journal. As long as there are no important problems of articles submitted (of which application were made), editors take them under pre-review process/under apprasial phase (receive them for preliminary consideration); take peer reviewers’ positive recommendations into consideration; and they do not change decisions which were made by former editor(s) as long as there are no serious problems. Editors carry out policies for blind review and peer-reviewing process which are among publication policies of the journal; keep secret peer reviewers’ identity information; and provide for each article to be reviewed neutrally/objectively and in due of its time. Editors send articles by paying field editors’ and peer reviewers’ specialties (areas of specialization) regard to and they support that reviews (evaluations) are carried out neutrally (objectively) and independently. Editors take into account whether or not there is conflict of interest-unity of interest among editors, peer reviewers and author(s) so that the article could be reviewed (evaluated) neutrally/objectively. Editors are on a quest in order for pool of peer reviewers to consist of a wide range and to be updated continuously. Editors block reviews (evaluations) which do not obey(conform) to academic rules of etiquette and which are not scientific. Editors enable publication procedures of the journal to be processed in a suitable way for publication policies and guides (guidelines); inform those, who have taken charge (task) in the process, of developments on publication policies; and prepare for training programme when required. Editor are in an effective communication with everyone who has taken charge (task) in publication process and they organize meetings at certain intervals. Editors provide/ensure protection of personal data in articles reviewed; and they protect authors’, peer reviewers’ and readers’ personal data. Editors conduct all publication activities through authory, given by publication board to editors, and they help authors.

Peer Reviewers’ Ethical Responsibilities

There is a double-blind peer review implementation that neither author(s) nor peer reviewers know/s eachother in Academic Journal of History and Idea. Peer reviewers do not get to know authors. Article review (evaluation) forms, requests (demands) for correction together with notes which are stated on the text are conveyed by editors to author(s) through journal management system. Peer reviewers who will review (evaluate) articles which would be published in Academic Journal of History and Idea are subject to the following ethical rules (codes of conduct): Peer reviewers should review articles concerning their specialties (field of specialization) only. Peer reviewers should conduct their reviews within the principle of privacy (confidentiality) and impartiality (neutrality/objectivity). Peer reviewers should carry out their reviews regardless of conditions such as nationality, gender, religious belief, political opinion (view) and commercial concerns etc. Peer reviewers should give up reviewing the article (the writing/manuscript) when they have thought that there is a conflict of interest or unity of interest in the writing which they have taken for review and they should give information of it to the editor. Peer reviewers should carry out the review in a constructive language and decorously (in a suitable way for academic rules of etiquette); and they should avoid personal comments consisting of defamation and hostility.

Peer reviewers should review the article, which they have accepted, in due of its time

Authors’ Ethical Responsibilities

Author(s) who has/have made an application for article to Academic Journal of History and Idea be deemed to have accepted the following ethical rules and responsibilities:

Author(s) should not send article(s), which was/were published anywhere or author(s) has/have sended for publication to different places, to Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi.

While author(s) is/are sending original and scientific articles to Academic Journal of History and Idea author(s) should also fill ‘‘the copyright release/transfer form to journal’’ and should send it together with the article. Author(s) should use references, from which author(s) have benefitted during the studies, in line with ethical principles and properly In case of the article with more than one author, these authors should be written in order from left side (left head) according to their contribution they have made. The author does not have the right of withdrawing the article of which reviewing process has begun, at the author’s personal pleasure (at the author’s own personal request). Author(s) has/have to certificate, if required, right of usage of knowledge/information which author(s) gave a place in their studies, and that the relevant permissions in researches-analyses or the approval from attendees upon whom authors have studied (done research) have been obtained. Author(s) should communicate with editors to give information of, correct or to withdraw the article when authors have noticed the mistake concerning the article which was published on electronic environment or under phase of the review (evaluation) and early appearance. Author(s) should state that author(s) have obtained approval by ethical board (ethical board’s approval) for studies which need to collect data through qualitative and quantitative methods, such as experiment, survey, scale, interview, observation and focus group work etc., which require decision by ethical board; on first-last page and in the method chapter of the article candidate, by name of ethical board, decision date and decision number, and author(s) should store the document which shows decision by ethical board (ethical board’s decision), into the system, together with application for the article. Author(s) should submit proofs within the article (for example, obtaining permission from others for the purpose of using others’ documents such as scales, surveys and photographs etc.) that author(s) has/have been attentive to ethical principles during data collection process. It should be stated that research&publication ethics and copyright regulations for intellectual and artistic works have been obeyed (comformed) to, in articles.

Situation Disobeying (Nonconforming) to Ethical Principles If there has been a situation that does not conform (disobeys) to ethical principles concerning editors, peer reviewers and authors, or in case of encountering an unethical situation with regard to an article which is under review process, early appearance or published, it should be informed to Academic Journal of History and Idea , via message, into e-mail address ‘‘ akademiktarihvedusunce@gmail.com’’ or ‘‘atddjournal@yandex.com’’, and in this context, the required measures shall be taken by the journal.

Ücret Politikası

Fee Policy
In accordance with the decision taken by the Higher Education Council (YÖK) at the General Assembly meeting on 07.03.2019, Academic History and Thought Journal is eligible for inclusion in the declaration of associate professorship applications. Since our journal falls under the category of journals that charge an article processing fee (APC) at the time of submission, regardless of acceptance or rejection, it does not qualify as a Predatory/Dubious journal.
Authors will not be refunded for articles that are rejected following the peer review process. Additionally, YÖK's Frequently Asked Questions and Answers section on Predatory/Dubious Journals from January 2021 explicitly states in response to Question 44:
"Journals that request a fee or an additional fee from the author for publication after article acceptance (Predatory/Dubious Journals) cannot be used in the declaration for associate professorship applications, as this constitutes a conflict of interest. However, these works may be included in the CV and list of publications."
Within this framework, journals meeting the following criteria may be included in the associate professorship application declaration:
*Journals that charge a fee at the time of submission, regardless of acceptance or rejection,
*Subscription-based journals that charge a fee to make an article open access,
*Journals that do not request any fees from authors throughout the publication process.
Academic History and Thought Journal does not receive financial support from any institution, organization, or sponsor. Article processing fees are collected solely to cover expenses related to the publication process.
Article Processing Fee
Articles uploaded to the system become subject to a fee after editorial approval. Authors are required to pay an article processing fee of 1,800 TL to cover costs such as DOI registration, intermediary service charges, publication evaluation process, and translation and revision of abstracts in foreign languages.
Authors who have reviewed two articles for our journal, as well as members of the editorial board and editors, are exempt from this fee.
For articles submitted from abroad, a fee of 117 USD or 200 Azerbaijani Manat is required, regardless of the country of submission.
Expedited Review Process
In the expedited review process, the initial decision is expected to be made within an average of three weeks from submission. However, it should be noted that this process does not increase the likelihood of acceptance.

No refunds will be issued for articles rejected after peer review or withdrawn by the author before the evaluation process is completed. There is no guarantee of publication, and fees will not be refunded for articles that do not successfully pass the review process.
By submitting an article, each author is deemed to have accepted the terms outlined above.

Kapak Resmi İndir

Sayı Dosyaları

İçindekiler / Contents/ JENERİK

Arşiv

По всем вопросам приема статей и выпуска очередных номеров обращаться в редакцию соответствующего журнала

Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

CC-BY-NC

Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 8.04.2025

Makaleler

Sayfa : 1-20

Sayfa : 21-54

Sayfa : 55-80

Sayfa : 81-101

Sayfa : 102-121

Sayfa : 122-143

Sayfa : 144-166

Sayfa : 167-179

Sayfa : 180-188

Sayfa : 189-196

Sayfa : 197-217

Sayfa : 218-228

Sayfa : 229-239

Sayfa : 240-249

Sayfa : 250-265

Sayfa : 266-275

Sayfa : 276-283

Sayfa : 292-306

Sayfa : 307-318

Sayfa : 319-332

Sayfa : 333-351

Sayfa : 352-364

Sayfa : 365-377

Sayfa : 378-392

Sayfa : 393-402

Sayfa : 403-420

Sayfa : 421-442

Sayfa : 443-450

Sayfa : 451-464

Sayfa : 465-505

Sayfa : 506-520

Sayfa : 521-539

Sayfa : 540-554

Sayfa : 555-577

Sayfa : 578-606

Sayfa : 607-619

Sayfa : 620-635

Sayfa : 636-645

Sayfa : 646-655

Sayfa : 656-663

Sayfa : 664-708

Sayfa : 709-719

Sayfa : 720-740

Sayfa : 753-770

Sayfa : 771-784

Sayfa : 785-801

Sayfa : 802-814

Sayfa : 815-831

Sayfa : 832-842

Sayfa : 843-855

Sayfa : 856-872

Sayfa : 873-892

Sayfa : 893-903

Sayfa : 904-922

Sayfa : 923-933

Sayfa : 934-942

Sayfa : 943-956

Sayfa : 957-973

Sayfa : 974-991

Sayfa : 992-1009

Sayfa : 1010-1025

Sayfa : 1026-1044

Sayfa : 1045-1053

Sayfa : 1054-1066

Sayfa : 1067-1087

Amaç ve Kapsam